aTypical Joe: a gay New Yorker living in the rural South

 

Wednesday, February 20, 2008

Obama: If not him, who? If not now, when?

As we wake to two more Obama victories, Wisconsin and Hawaii, I return again to Richard Thompson Ford in Sunday’s WaPo:

None of the presidential candidates has proposed a policy response to the real racial problems facing our society: Many of our nation’s cities are as racially segregated as they were in the era of Jim Crow, many minority neighborhoods are crime-plagued and bereft of opportunities for gainful employment, and one in three black men between 20 and 29 is in prison, on parole or on probation.

Thompson Ford has an important book out, The Race Card: How Bluffing About Bias Makes Race Relations Worse, that argues that race relations, in our post-civil rights era, are more complex and contradictory than those of the unambiguously white supremacist past.

I said on the occasion of his OpEd and I ask again:

Looking for coded racism is tricky business; kind of like Bush’s war on terrorism—once we start looking we can find it anywhere. We ought to be careful.

I need to read the book to learn the nuance of the argument. I’ve seen the interview, read the first chapter and reviews and easily agree with what I understand of its central thesis. But it occurs to me that the Race Card can be flipped. We might reasonably ask why is Obama not addressing these very same racial issues that [Thompson Ford] describes in [his] piece.

Yes, I agree, no candidate “has proposed a policy response to the real racial problems facing our society.” By by that very same logic, shouldn’t it be Obama? Not solely because he is the black candidate—though he is—but because he has that absolutely terrific record in Illinois.

Even better, we know from his writings where he stands on so much of this. If he won’t tackle these issues in the relative safety of a primary fight, can we expect him to do it in the general election? And after he is elected, will he do it when hope turns to gritty Washington reality?

Why, in this vitally important presidential primary race, are we talking about the race card and not about issues of racial justice?

Now, I’m just not as swept up in hope as the rest of this nation. Call me cynical or call me whatever you want, but look at my blog in the last week and you’ll begin to understand why…

I’m mad as hell that not only did a Mississippi man, Kennedy Brewer, spend 15 years in prison for a crime he didn’t do, he was held in jail for several years after the DNA revealed his innocence as prosecutors decided whether to retry him. As if this wasn’t bad enough, the whole damned story was not news!

Does anyone want to hazard a guess as to the race of Mr. Kennedy Brewer?

Look at my post from last, evidence of malice. A 17 year-old Atlanta boy—again, want to guess his race???—in a case where the prosecutor did not believe the evidence justified a murder prosecution, is being tried as an adult. For murder. Why? His DA boss ordered it!

Now, I have been convinced by the evidence that there are indeed malicious unlawful convictions and that this is something that must be addressed in our criminal justice system. But I do not believe that is the sole cause for the gross disparity in the number of African Americans in our prisons.

I sit here writing from this rural Georgia community that is far more integrated than the Manhattan neighborhood I lived in for 25 years, in the South that has a rural black population unheard of in the North. I note that my black neighbors here voted for Obama in overwhelming numbers, and I ask, if he won’t raise these issues, if he won’t do something about it, who will? And if not now, is he just waiting until after he is elected?

Every person I admire supports him: Larry Lessig, Melissa Harris-Lacewell, Cory Booker, and pretty much every New York friend (some of whom have been uncharacteristically nasty towards me for my support of Hillary) to name just a very few.

But they can’t tell me how precisely this change is going to work. Obama’s going to get to Washington and face a corporate, bureaucratic, media and government establishment all enamored with change—but I’m guessing it’s change for someone else they all want and I will be interested to see what change for themselves they are willing to make.

I promise you my vote will be for Obama; he has my wholehearted support and all my hope. It looks to me like he’ll need it. Because the change I want, the change I need—good old equality and social justice—looks to me like it’s going to be just as hard to achieve tomorrow as it was to achieve yesterday.

Next entry: The Obama Delusion Previous entry: Evidence of malice?
 

Recent Posts

Please leave a comment

  1. Seeing your posts in favor of Hillary have definitely helped me feel less like this is a fight to the death and more like it’s an election where ideas are the issue, so thanks for that. 

    I thought I may mention a couple of the things that have me in the pro-Obama camp.  He has presented himself (hopefully he’ll stick with it) as someone who will surround himself with experts and ideas, considering all viewpoints.  I am personally a fan of this approach to life in general and it appeals to me.  It’s certainly a change from Bush.

    And to be a little issue-oriented, one of the things that has me very frustrated with Hillary is her lack of support for crack sentencing reform.  I’m honestly shocked that she’s against it and can’t really understand why.  As someone who’s concerned about criminal defense, I’m glad Obama is in favor of crack sentencing reform, against mandatory minimums, and did a lot of work in Illinois to change their criminal system (death penalty moratorium, requiring recordings for all interrogations).  I also hope that since his community organizer days aren’t so far behind him that he will be able to remember the effects of big laws on little people.  Anyway, I definitely admire the way you approach the whole thing and I’m going to try and be less vehement just for you.

    Maggie  on  02/20  at  02:43 PM
  2. Of course, my very point in the post is that Obama is so good on these issues—I am aware of crack sentencing reform and also that he led the effort in Illinois to pass legislation that would require police interrogations and confessions from suspects to be videotaped—but he doesn’t address these issues in the campaign. Why?

    They need the attention and focus of the American public in order to be solved. My very concern is that if he won’t bring them up in the protection of a primary, then he will not in the general election and he will not in the White House. He will become more like Hillary not less.

    As to Hillary & crack, I can’t claim to know her specific view on crack sentencing. I would be surprised if she supported it on the merits, and would be interested to read it if you could point me to her current statements in favor of harsh crack sentencing practices. she is known to be strategic, as on gay marriage issues, and I understand that though I don’t always agree with it.

    Joe  on  02/21  at  03:26 AM
  3. I completely agree.  I wish it would come up, though I understand as the big fight with the Republicans inches closer, that liberals tend to downplay their own liberalism.  Obama addressed this earlier in the campaign, which I appreciate.  But I think it needs to be heard more. 

    As for Clinton’s stance on crack retroactivity (I think I forgot to mention the retroactivity in my previous comment) she’s come out against it while Obama is in favor of it.  As you probably know, the US Sentencing Commission recently corrected the disaparity in sentencing between crack and powder cocaine, one that had black offenders serving substantially more time than white offenders when there’s no real reason for it.  The Commission recommended making the changes retroactive, to affect those already incarcerated. 

    Here’s a link to an article shortly after she spoke out against retroactivity:
    http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1207/7127.html

    The issue went largely unnoticed.  And Obama hasn’t come back to spend much time on the criminal defense issues, which to me shows he’s thinking about future attacks from the right. 

    If you don’t know it, Sentencing Law & Policy is a great blog that keeps track on general sentencing issues around the country.  Here’s a relevant link:

    http://sentencing.typepad.com/sentencing_law_and_policy/2008/02/where-candidate.html

    Maggie  on  02/21  at  12:14 PM
  4. Page 1 of 1 pages

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Smileys

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below: